Turns out the guy who couldn't remember anything under oath did know at one point in time Fani Willis was corrupt. Most of the stuff he conveniently forgotten he had sent in text messages.
https://apnews.com/article/willis-wade-trump-bradley-text-messages-b10041b3446df0426ca8e3192a042162 ATLANTA (AP) — Attorneys for Donald Trump and other defendants in the Georgia election interference case hoped that lawyer Terrence Bradley would provide key testimony in support of their effort to remove Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis — and they had good reason for their optimism.
Over several months, Bradley had been in touch with Ashleigh Merchant, a lawyer for Trump co-defendant Michael Roman, according to hundreds of text messages produced by Merchant as evidence and obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday.
Through the texts, Bradley fed Merchant information and made suggestions to help her prove that Willis had dated Nathan Wade, a special prosecutor hired for the election case. As Wade’s former law partner and onetime divorce attorney, Bradley was well positioned to know things, and the texts seem to back that up.
But when he took the stand to testify under oath in mid-February, Bradley initially refused to answer most questions, asserting attorney-client privilege. On Tuesday, when the judge compelled him to testify after determining some of his communications with Wade weren’t privileged, he repeatedly said he didn’t know or couldn’t remember crucial details. CNN reported on the text messages Wednesday.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Merchant filed a motion Jan. 8 seeking to remove Willis and Wade and their offices from the election case and to toss out the indictment against Trump and 14 others. She alleged that the prosecutors had been romantically involved before Wade was hired in November 2021, and she said Willis paid Wade large sums, then improperly benefited from his earnings when he took her on vacations. “I am nervous,” Merchant texted Bradley the day she filed her motion, adding, “This is huge.” He responded with a string of encouraging messages: “You are huge,” “You will be fine,” “You are one of the best lawyers I know,” “Go be great.” The text exchanges show that Bradley willingly provided information to Merchant at least from mid-September through early February. But when Merchant questioned Bradley on Tuesday, asking whether he remembered telling her certain things, he said he did not, said he had been speculating or said she misinterpreted his messages. “I have no direct knowledge of when the relationship started,” Bradley said on the stand, repeating versions of that several times throughout the hearing. Visibly frustrated at one point, Merchant told Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee, “Judge, he doesn’t remember much of anything right now.”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
McAfee has scheduled arguments for Friday on the motions to disqualify Willis and her office from the election case. It’s not clear whether attorneys for Trump and some of his co-defendants have met their burden of showing that Willis and Wade’s relationship created a conflict of interest. Willis and Wade acknowledged the relationship in February, but said it began after Wade was hired and that it ended last summer. Both insist the relationship did not create a conflict and had no bearing on the election interference case. A Fulton County grand jury in August indicted Trump and 18 others on charges related to their efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, won by President Joe Biden. But the details of Willis and Wade’s relationship have completely overshadowed those charges for nearly two months and may continue to be a distraction even if the judge doesn’t remove Willis and her office from the case. Early in the text exchanges, on Sept. 18, Merchant asked Bradley if he knew of anyone who would be willing to write a sworn statement on Willis and Wade’s relationship. He responded: “No...no one would freely burn that bridge.”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
In mid-December, Merchant texted Bradley to say she had gotten “more confirmation about fani and Nathan” but couldn’t get anyone to go on the record. On Jan. 5, just three days before she filed her motion, Merchant texted Bradley that Wade had taken Willis on a cruise and a trip to Napa Valley in California, saying she assumed Bradley knew about it. He responded that he didn’t and asked when the trips happened. But then he said it didn’t surprise him, adding that they had taken other trips together. That same day, Merchant asked whether Bradley believed the relationship started before Willis hired Wade and he responded, “Absolutely.” The next day, they discussed a draft of her motion that she had sent him. He said she should include money he had been paid by Willis’ office in a footnote detailing money paid to Wade’s firm. After she made that change, she asked, “Anything else? Anything that isn’t accurate?” He responded, “Looks good.” That specific exchange was the source of much frustration among defense attorneys at Tuesday’s hearing. They grilled Bradley about why he had written that, only to insist on the stand that he couldn’t remember important information that was included in the motion. The texts show Bradley confirming information for Merchant and suggesting records she should request or people she should subpoena. Though he sometimes seemed to want to make sure certain information couldn’t be traced to him, he said he was “ok with” being subpoenaed to testify.
Anonymous
Now will Trump and his henchmen be sued for defaming Willis?
Anonymous
>>1273251 lying under oath is fine, according to the dems. remember how they didn't impeach clinton after he lied under oath about raping that child in the oval office?
Anonymous
>>1273251 >>1273263 >Uh oh, he lied under oath? That's typically what Democrats do. They are kinda known for it, desu
>>1273260 Probably not considering this entire article is about how this coworker of fani willis was sending them text messages telling them this stuff was happening as it happened
Anonymous
>>1273265 >as it happened This was months after it happened.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273266 Oh sorry, I guess you're right, he told them about it after it happened.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273251 I'M OUTRAGED!!1 HE OUGHT TO APOLOGIZE!!11
Anonymous
>>1273263 >remember how they didn't impeach clinton after he lied under oath about raping that child in the oval office? wild chud head cannon
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1273277 No rape was ever claimed. Monica Lewinsky wasn't a child. She was 22 years old. You're bad at spreading propaganda, Ivan.
Anonymous
>>1273279 so you admit he lied under oath and that lying under oath isn't a big deal because the dems didn't impeach him for it?
Anonymous
>>1273280 >so you admit he lied under oath Of course he did. The other details you mentioned were a lie. There was no rape. There was no child. You lied. Lets not forget that.
>lying under oath isn't a big deal because the dems didn't impeach him for it? Lying under oath is a huge deal and he was impeached you fucking moron. You are 0 for 3 on your propaganda, Ivan. You can't even get the most basic details right.
Anonymous
>>1273280 Hot Take: You should actually be allowed to lie to the government about shit that isn't their business.
If the feds ask me what I had for breakfast while investigating who stole the Declaration of Independence, and I say chicken and waffles instead of pop-tarts, unless they legitimately thought I ate the Declaration of Independence, that shit shouldn't have any fucking legal consequences.
Having said all that, they tried to fucking remove Clinton from office over that shit.
Anonymous
>>1273281 >Of course he did. The other details you mentioned were a lie. There was no rape. There was no child. You lied. Lets not forget that. so you are saying he just sexually harassed that one intern? and also violently raped multiple women before he was president and also raped multiple kids with epstine
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick022599.htm https://nypost.com/2019/08/14/epstein-had-bizarre-painting-of-bill-clinton-in-dress-heels-in-townhouse/ >Lying under oath is a huge deal so why wasn't clinton impeached?
> and he was impeached you fucking moron. nope, dems defended their rapist in chief
https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/20745.jpeg >You are 0 for 3 on your propaganda, Ivan. You can't even get the most basic details right. unlike you and obongo, I am American
Anonymous
>>1273282 how is raping your intern while at work as president not the government's business? and dems didn't. it was pretty much party lines because dems would rather have a lying child rapist as president than do what is right
Anonymous
Quoted By:
More likely lied in a text.
Anonymous
>>1273283 >>1273284 chud headcanon is so erotic
Anonymous
>>1273286 >believe women >unless they accuse a democrat Anonymous
>>1273288 >believe women >unless they were paid by judicialwatch to lie Anonymous
>>1273283 >so you are saying he just sexually harassed that one intern? He got a blowjob in the oval office from one intern. No rape or sexual harassment was ever alleged. You're lying again.
>and also violently raped multiple women before he was president and also raped multiple kids with epstine Conspiracy posting belongs on
>>>/pol/ . You're pivoting to other random shit because you got caught lying.
>so why wasn't clinton impeached? He was impeached. You have no clue what you're talking about.
>nope, dems defended their rapist in chief You said he wasn't impeached. He was impeached. That was a lie. Lewinksy also never accused him of rape. That's another lie.
>unlike you and obongo, I am American Yet everything you've said is a lie. You said he wasn't impeached. That was a lie. You said he raped Monica Lewinsky in his office. That was a lie. You said Monica Lewinsky was a child. That was a lie. Go back to your troll farm, Ivan. You're actually too incompetent to spread propaganda.
Anonymous
>>1273288 Monica Lewinsky never accused Bill Clinton of rape. You're lying again.
Anonymous
>>1273289 >>1273290 >>1273291 watch as correct the record leaps into action to defend known child rapist bill clinton
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273292 Is this like in 2020 when you said Biden was a pedo for sniffing some hair?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Wow another case of conservatives lying then not being able to back their shit up in court. Just can’t believe anything they say.
i may be a fag, but at least i'm a real man who don't wear dresses
i may be a fag, but at least i'm a real man who don't wear dresses Sun 03 Mar 2024 05:58:05 No. 1273319 Report >>1273280 why do you lie on purpose anon?
We can no longer believe anything that you say here.
You have lost all your integrity, and once a man loses his integrity, he has lost an essential part of what makes him a man.
Very few politicians have kept their integrity, lik Honest abe, and I chopped down that cherry tree, Georgie, and Bernie, who only thinks of us poor people.
My pop had integrity, and he taught me to always me above board in my dealings with people, and then I'd be a real man, and you'll never see me wearing dresses!
Anonymous
>>1273319 >bernie >integraty he has 8 mansions he bought with chinese bribes and literally accepted bribes from clinton and bloomberg
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This just sounds like Bradley trying to get into zmerchant's pants.
Anonymous
>>1273279 >According to Willey, during an early afternoon meeting on November 29, 1993, in the private study of the Oval Office, Clinton had embraced her tightly, kissed her on the lips, grabbed her breast, and forced her hand on his genitals.[3] Clinton denied assaulting Willey. According to Monica Lewinsky's testimony, Clinton stated that the allegation was absurd because Willey is a small-breasted woman, so he would never pursue such a woman. a man aint a man once he loses his integrity
a man aint a man once he loses his integrity Sun 03 Mar 2024 09:40:49 No. 1273338 Report >>1273321 >8 mansions why do you lie on purpose anon?
We can no longer believe anything that you say here.
You have lost all your integrity, and once a man loses his integrity, he has lost an essential part of what makes him a man.
Anonymous
>>1273335 https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/willey031998.htm >In the affidavit, Steele said Willey called her in March or April of 1997 and asked her to tell Newsweek magazine that Willey had visited her house and related the story of a sexual encounter the night of the Clinton meeting. Steele said Willey instructed her to say that Willey was "upset" and "humiliated" at being "groped" by the president. Steele did so, but later recanted before Newsweek printed its story in August. >Newsweek, however, has reported that Steele told the magazine as recently as February that Willey did describe to her a sexual "overture" by Clinton, though not necessarily an unwelcome one, and not on the same day of the incident. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Willey >She was paid $2,500 for the appearance by a Political Action Committee headed by Roger Stone. Anonymous
>>1273339 The accusation is still there, regardless. Clinton stands accused of rape, for decades. Same with Joe Biden. That's not even including all the Epstein connections where he's raping underage girls.
BTFO'd.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Why do right-wing retards always conflate "impeachment" with "conviction after impeachment"?
Anonymous
>>1273341 >The accusation is still there, No one with a brain takes it seriously
>Clinton stands accused of rape, for decades. Same with Joe Biden. If you believe that I've got a a bridge to sell you
>That's not even including all the Epstein connections where he's raping underage girls. lol
https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-doe-jeffrey-epstein-documents-unsealed-2024-1 Anonymous
>>1273339 >>1273279 Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones
>>1273344 >No one with a brain takes it seriously believe women, unless they accuse a democrat
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273251 >Turns out the guy who couldn't remember anything Even if Biden is a senile old men, I adore his funny, yet forgettable for him moments.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273276 >>1273286 Chud chudding chuds in the chudertown for chudies
CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD
CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD
CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD
CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD
CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD CHUD
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273345 believe women, unless they accuse a democrat, unless they were paid to lie by political enemies
Anonymous
I appreciate the Republican commitment to integrity and honesty, I mean could you imagine if two professionals who had dated later worked together? What a fucking controversy, they could never be trusted to do their job right.
Anonymous
hey guys were being accused of doing something bad OH SHIT BRING UP THE THING THAT HAPPENED 30 YEARS AGO
johnny cochroach
Quoted By:
>>1273371 if the cum stained dress don't fit, then you gotta acquit.
Anonymous
>>1273369 >>1273369 It's pretty corrupt to hire pay your bf public funds to do work he's not even qualified for. The dudes an ambulance chaser and was given millions of public money to criminally prosecute a president.
The dudes a fucking personal injury attorney.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273375 But for someone with the attention span of a hummingbird, they already stopped reading after the first three words. And they just don't understand what the problem is. You must be a fascist racist.
Anonymous
>>1273375 dont say that too loud, youll hurt jared kushners feelings
Anonymous
>>1273377 Presumably he was as qualified as anyone else to "deliver peace in the middle east", and got the Abraham accords signed.
This is Nathan Wade's first felony prosecution against the former president of the United States. Presumably there are more qualified private attorneys that Fani isnt fucking.
Anonymous
>>1273378 so, youre saying that one lawyer isn't qualified to perform law in areas of the legal field they arent proficient in
but its perfectly for okay for a nondiplomat to perform in the diplomatic profession, even though there are 1) people who work in the diplomatic field and 2) people who are professional diplomats who are also middle east experts
makes sense when youre a GOpedo
i am a facebook scholar, this is where i learned about the clotshot
i am a facebook scholar, this is where i learned about the clotshot Sun 03 Mar 2024 16:46:25 No. 1273381 Report Quoted By:
>>1273338 >why do you lie on purpose anon? It isn't lies if the anon believes it.
Ignorant people believe a lot of untrue things, and the main thing that these people have in common is that they're too intellectually lazy and/or they don't have the intelligence to begin with too understand what they read.
Anonymous
>>1273379 >but its perfectly for okay for a nondiplomat to perform in the diplomatic profession, even though there are 1) people who work in the diplomatic field and 2) people who are professional diplomats who are also middle east experts How many decades did your supposed experts sit around with their giant dildos up their faggot asses doing nothing?
Experts in what exactly? Spending others people money?
Anonymous
>>1273382 ah yes, the age old argument of "people bad because i say so." very clever
Anonymous
>>1273383 So your inability to name a single thing the people you claim are experts have done successfully is evidence that they're actually very good at their job.
Anonymous
>>1273384 your argument is literally that the entire field of diplomacy is useless. why would someone talking about "success" be anything other than proving your point? if you wanted, you could look it up yourself, you dont need me to google things for you. im not your mother
Anonymous
>>1273385 No dumbass, my argument is that it's a very poor comparison to bring up Kushner as an example of Nepotism (even though I'm pretty sure Trump wasn't fucking Jared and Fani is fucking Nathan Wade) when he was successful in his endeavor and Wade, a complete amateur, is about to get his case dismissed.
The "proof is in the pudding", faggot.
Anonymous
>>1273386 were aware you like, "people bad because i say so," you don't need to keep repeating it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273387 Great point bud. Unfortunately your arguing with a retard who only uses confirmation bias and has the wool pulled over his eyes by the Orange Jesus. Death to Trump
Anonymous
>>1273387 >I just don't like people and that's how I form opinions Ok faggot liberal.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1273382 And the middle east remains in a state of peace. Well worth the 2 bil the saudis paid kushner.
By the way, a DA hiring a special prosecutor who isn't particularly adept at the job seems like a boon for Trump, why wouldn't his legal time enjoy going against an inexperienced rookie who they could trounce at trial? Why are they hellbent on avoid the merits of the case and instead focusing on procedural wrangling of who will sit in the prosecutor chair?
Anonymous
>>1273402 >Why would trumps legal team point out they are being pursued by a corrupt DA who is using this as an excuse to personally enrich her self and her partner A perplexing question surely vexing the minds of many learned men
Anonymous
>>1273415 this has to be one of the weakest trumpfag counters yet
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273426 Normally would say there are no stupid questions, only stupid people, but this question posed here
>>1273402 is both stupid and shows you are a retard
Anonymous
>>1273415 The DA picked a special prosecutor, something they are legally able to do. If the DA picked one who is under qualified that's a win for the trump team, right? I mean, she could have just led the case herself if she wanted to, and who the prosecutor in the courtroom is doesn't change the DA's charging decision, the returned indictment from a grand jury, or the underlying facts, right? So the only choices for why trumps lawyers are fighting this are a) they want to delay delay delay because they're worried about the merits of the case, or b) total idiots
Anonymous
>>1273715 Maybe it's an even bigger win for trump showing that the case against him is being used as an excuse to enrich the DA and her lover?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273715 I really can't see how pointing out prosecutorial misconduct is anything but a win for Trump.
If it was truly irrelevant the judge wouldn't have allowed it in at all. Again, this is a judge who personally donated to Fani Willis's campaign, and he's allowing this evidence in.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1273718 Except they haven't been together for months and lawyers for the government draw salaries for *all* cases.
Also this almost definitely pays less than private practice.
Anonymous