[20 / 1 / ?]
god bonta should be fired from his job, he literally can't stop losing. Also I shit you not the tags for this article on reuters are
>Government
>Constitutional Law
>Human Rights
>Supreme Court of the United States
>Government
so human rights denying faggots btfo'd
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/californias-one-gun-a-month-law-struck-down-by-federal-judge-2024-03-11/
Government
Constitutional Law
Human Rights
Supreme Court of the United States
Government
California's one-gun-a-month law struck down by federal judge
By Diana Novak Jones
March 11, 20248:36 PM EDTUpdated a day ago
Firearms Unknown as Biden considers legislation restricting "ghost guns\
Hunting rifles are displayed for sale at Firearms Unknown, a gun store in Oceanside, California, U.S., April 12, 2021. REUTERS/Bing Guan Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
March 11 (Reuters) - A California law barring the purchase of more than one gun in a 30-day period was struck down on Monday by a federal judge who said it failed a test for state laws laid out in the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling expanding gun rights.
U.S. District Judge William Hayes sided with a group of California residents, gun retailers and gun rights nonprofits in finding that the one-gun-a-month law did not fit within the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation. The law remains in place for now because the judge stayed his ruling for 30 days to give the state time to appeal.
The ruling, opens new tab is the latest to deem a state gun law unconstitutional in the wake of the high court’s landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which dramatically expanded gun rights.
Bill Sack, the director of legal operations for the Second Amendment Foundation, one of the groups challenging the law, told Reuters that the California law was a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment.
"Inherent to the right to keep and bear arms is the right to acquire them," Sack said.
>Government
>Constitutional Law
>Human Rights
>Supreme Court of the United States
>Government
so human rights denying faggots btfo'd
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/californias-one-gun-a-month-law-struck-down-by-federal-judge-2024-03-11/
Government
Constitutional Law
Human Rights
Supreme Court of the United States
Government
California's one-gun-a-month law struck down by federal judge
By Diana Novak Jones
March 11, 20248:36 PM EDTUpdated a day ago
Firearms Unknown as Biden considers legislation restricting "ghost guns\
Hunting rifles are displayed for sale at Firearms Unknown, a gun store in Oceanside, California, U.S., April 12, 2021. REUTERS/Bing Guan Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
March 11 (Reuters) - A California law barring the purchase of more than one gun in a 30-day period was struck down on Monday by a federal judge who said it failed a test for state laws laid out in the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling expanding gun rights.
U.S. District Judge William Hayes sided with a group of California residents, gun retailers and gun rights nonprofits in finding that the one-gun-a-month law did not fit within the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation. The law remains in place for now because the judge stayed his ruling for 30 days to give the state time to appeal.
The ruling, opens new tab is the latest to deem a state gun law unconstitutional in the wake of the high court’s landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which dramatically expanded gun rights.
Bill Sack, the director of legal operations for the Second Amendment Foundation, one of the groups challenging the law, told Reuters that the California law was a clear violation of the 2nd Amendment.
"Inherent to the right to keep and bear arms is the right to acquire them," Sack said.
