[10 / 1 / 1]
Quoted By: >>1289870
They’ve ruled the NY court made a mistake allowing women who were not part of the trial to testify against Weinstein.
“We conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes,” the court’s 4-3 decision said. “The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial.”
https://www.showbiz411.com/2024/04/25/shocker-harvey-weinstein-ny-conviction-overturned-by-panel-of-female-judges
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibX7rkdDAEE
“We conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes,” the court’s 4-3 decision said. “The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial.”
https://www.showbiz411.com/2024/04/25/shocker-harvey-weinstein-ny-conviction-overturned-by-panel-of-female-judges
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibX7rkdDAEE
