>>2681993>Division of labor is tradeno it isn't. temple economies for example have a division of labour without using trade. companies have a division of labour internally without using trade. hunter-gatherer tribes have a division of labour even if they don't produce a surplus
exchange comes in two forms: C-M-C (trade, buying and selling) or C-C (barter) where C is a commodity and M is money. this notion is due to Adam Smith. as far as we can tell barter has never been the basis of any mode of production
getting back to the issue at hand, for whoring to be possible there has to be a common unit of exchange. trade must be widespread. else if you're having sex with lots of people you're not a whore; you're a slut. there's a difference. Beavis' mom is a slut, not a whore
