>>1280860>I couldn't give a shit about the history of the .30-30>If you go to any major store that sells bullets you'll see a ratio of 10:1 for the different kinds of 308 to 30-30I mean, first off, not really and second off, so what?
>look how many modern rifles are in .308 and then look at all the useless shit that's in .30-30obviously .30-30 is not actually that useless if it's still in common use today.
Can you show me on the doll where the levergun hurt you?
>you're also comparing a brush calibre to a do-it-all calibre...and? doesn't your own argument imply that 30-30 still has its niche then?
>if the old fucks back in the day had a .308 rifle compared to a .30-30, they would choose the .308they actually did, it was called .30-06 and .30-30 rifles still outsold it dramatically. Again, .30-30 has killed more deer on the North American continent than any other caliber out there.
.308 is just a slightly updated .30-06 using different powder and a slightly shorter case.
>So either you can continue to fuck around playing john wayne in the bush or you can stop fucking around and pick a proper calibre for more modern times.hahahaha are you really trying to argue that novelty automatically means better? you really have a gigantic hate boner for levergats in .30-30.
Actually, by your own logic you should stop playing Jeff Cooper and fucking around with .308 and pick a properly new caliber like 6.5 creedmoor or .300 blackout. Because only "modern" is acceptable, right?
Seriously though, did a .30-30 levergat rape you in the past or something? You don't get that kind of an irrational hate boner without some serious past trauma. ...Or you could just be one of those weird authoritarians who think that everyone needs to like what you do and use what you do, and "get with the times." Judging by your spelling, you're either a britbong or a strayan and so that also kind of explains the weird authoritarianism.
