>>2707561Your claim was as follows.
>There is only one goal: land preservation. The idea that forests exist for the amusement and profit of man is a core tenant of the demon worshipers.The quote and subsequent links was never to argue that conservation and preservation is not a goal of the NPS. It was to counter your claim that it was the only goal, and that amusement was not a goal. This claim has been soundly debunked.
If you think
nps.gov is not a sufficient source for discussing the nps, you are a complete pseudointellectual. It's embarrassing. The reason I even placate your desire for a link is because I wanted to see what you would do with it. I expected the goalpost to shift, but denying your own words and the validity of the source is pathetic.
