>>4307759you have ''3d pop'' and ''muh character'' idiots
and then you have ''its not real'' idiots who straight up deny physics and visual difference
both are wrong.
it does exist but its not 3d fucking pop, its simple fucking light physics and very, very, very, very, very precise and nano-scopic level precision manufacturing of glass. theres no magic to it.
its basically a question of ''who can make the clearest, least distorted light projector glass and make the light passing through the lens have the least amount of refraction, diffraction, reflection and caused aberrations?"
some big camera manufacturers and most, if not all 3rd party lens manufacturers lack the proper machinery to do so, reason being either of financial nature or because of greed and not wanting to spend so much money on expensive machinery for making cheap costing glass (e.g tamron, sigma, viltrox, samyang, laowa, 7artisans, lensbaby, etc, etc) while the few 3rd party manufacturers that do have the machinery to do so (mitakon, voigtlander, etc..) also struggle financially at the moment and cant be competitive with their product pricing because its VERY expensive using those machines and your average joe nowadays will appreciate sharpness of a lens more than visual quality and accuracy.
