>>4270797>nooooo it's fine at ISO 400!!!So is a DSLR from 2002. Here you can see how shit the A9iii is even at 25k. 12800 is honestly its top ISO, and at 12800 it gets beat by the 5DsR from 2015. And that's not known as a particularly clean camera.
>but I would not give a single shit about this quip until dpreview has an actual educated person (not bill claff) test the A9III for noise reduction in rawsYou can plainly see the smoothing in their studio shots. Without the forced NR the A9iii is probably 2 stops behind other FF bodies at high ISO. mft territory. Even with forced NR it's 2 stops behind the R6 at the very top, i.e. R6 204k looks like A9iii 51k.
I guess it's a good outdoor daytime sports camera.
