>>4297696most likely elitism and/or trying to help people actually learn exposure settings(probably the latter but coming off as assholes). Auto can cause a lot of issues and be frustrating to new users when it doesn't work or provide piss poor results. Understanding exposure helps a lot when actually editing the raws in general. But if you're completely new and don't want to tinker auto with jpeg out will suffice for the majority of people not trying to get the absolute best shot and just doing general photos of the family and videos not caring about peak IQ.
I'm new to cameras, but took all of 5 minutes to understand the histogram, manual settings, auto iso, I set my shutterspeed for the light I need and fstops for how much of a inclusion I want, it's obscenely simple.
>>4302119>iso limits to 3200homie even my cheapass canon r50 is fine at 6400(pushing above it starts getting iffy on my cheap rfs55-210 but is relatively okay on my rf50mm 1.8f. If you have a better quality camera(especially a ff) you should be fine bumping it up.
Pic rel at iso 6400