>>4262474>MUH LAWZ OF PHYSICS!Apply the same if you print smaller or even just take a step back. Anyone can prove this by taking a high ISO image, scaling it to 1/2 its native resolution (make sure any NR options in the scaling are OFF), and then printing both to the same exact print size (i.e. 8x10).
Well...anyone with a camera and a photo printer, which leaves you out.
>>4262478>You’re using a read noise dominated ISO setting because you know he’s right The source of the noise doesn't matter. Downsampling...whether its explicit or implicit...affects all noise the same. You would know this if you weren't too fucking lazy to go to dpreview and look at other ISOs, and too poor to own a camera+printer to experiment. Since you're lazy, I've included yet another example for you.
>but only about shot noise if you apply NR/blurring algorithmsYou can just do that to the native resolution one.
