>>4262383>>the z7 is 1 whole stop ahead of "equivalence" at 22.5mp resizes. Still on this shit? When you view a high resolution image at the same size as a lower resolution one, you have already downsampled, even though you did not explicitly use an algorithm to do so. You do not have another stop which you can gain by using an algorithm. Printing a FF 45mp shot to 16x24 is practically no different from downsampling it to 22.5mp and then printing it to 16x24.
>>the simple fact that equivalence isn't practical reality:It happens any time you want the same fov and dof.
>>it is a rare and often shitty situation that you can not shoot at a lower ISO than a crop sensor's baseThe fuck are you talking about? People need to shoot at higher ISOs all the fucking time. I mean, people who walk outside their basement.
>>it is a rare and often shitty situation that you can not add light with strobes, speedlights, or continuous lightIt's the average situation. People don't walk around with strobe kits, and light from a single head-on flash sucks vs natural light.
>>in those situations where even a real photographer cant add light - sports and wildlife - full frame's telephotos are all significantly faster than MFTs anyways so equivalence is just a "if in theory" game that's meaningless because wide open DOF is more than enough on thoseThe only thing you've said that makes any sense. But that's because you generally want to isolate the wildlife from busy backgrounds.
>>it is also a rare situation that you can not shoot your average lens wide open - everything up to 50mm f1.4 has shitloads of DOFAnd now you're talking out your ass again.
The problem with /p/ is that it's loaded with basement dwellers shooting their cats convinced that however they shot their cat (lens, lighting, settings) is the ONLY way anyone ever needs to shoot anything.
