>>4300516>>4300532>what aperture are you shooting at?Tried 3.5, 5.6, not really any difference
haven't tried very narrow ones since they cause diffraction and affect center sharpness but I guess I'll set things up and test it soon just in case that's the issue. I have some doubts though.
>nikon z6iiFF
>i used to use an 80mm (on aps-c) for film scanning, but now just do it with a 30mm, both have been fineAPS-C
Since both of you are using bigger formats I guess it might be worth mentioning that the optics in the 30mm oly are quite tiny, and seem to be enlarged enlarged toward the rear, could this be the issue?
The front element is only around 12-14mm wide and it's 1.25x magnification, other lenses like Panasonic's 30mm appear to have bigger elements and most expensive lenses outside of meme probe stuff for ultra macro use (5x, etc) seem to be way bigger from what I saw.
Also part of the issue might be the subject, a "non flat" but layered LCD, so maybe oblique angles caused by the small optics are less of a problem with more flat/natural things but idk. I know monitors viewed up close in person have color shifts/glow issues and viewing them from afar improves their performance but this is a $200 lens so maybe I shouldn't have expected corner to corner sharpness at max magnification.
Also
>>4300532 you're shooting film (I assume 35mm?) on APS-C, so that's probably not 1:1 unless you're stitching, have you seen whether 1:1 (not fitting the whole neg into frame) hurts your edges at all assuming you're not stitching?