>>4268710Fuckup #1: Comparing different amounts of shadow pushes
Fuckup #2: Comparing chroma noise when fuji has to reduce it just to show you a usable image
Fuckup #3: Not noticing that the R5 is still sharper and xtrans noise looks "destructive" (because it's already been reduced to generate a visible image that isnt a green checkerboard). This is meant to make it look more like film, which is why fuji went forward with a flawed CFA.
Fuckup #4: Doing extreme shadow pushes to compare a dual gain and a single gain sensor. Dual gain sensors are (normally) worse at extreme shadow recovery at base ISO, and the camera industry has made them anyways for a very good reason: It turns out no one ever recovers shadows beyond 2-3 EV because even with a "better" single gain stage readout for shadow recovery, the image looks like double shit especially in real scenes instead of test charts. Dual gain sensors are less noisy for how sane photographers use their cameras - by raising the ISO and getting it right in camera, or overexposing and bringing it down. Single gain sensors are better at looking the exact same with any exposure push, but are noisier if you use them like a sane person (get it right in camera). Dual gain also offers better highlight recovery, so you can expose your shadows more properly and just bring the highlights back down, more similar to how film is shot.
>Why does fuji not use a dual gain sensor on the xtwhatever? single gain looks so much better on this unrealistic dpreview test!Because they are significantly more expensive. The X-H2s has a dual gain sensor. Fuji, like everyone else, thinks dual gain sensors are better
Fuckup #5: Doing "equivalence" on dpreview's exposure lattitude tool, which is not exposure normalized. Fuji users lower ISOs anyways!
Fuckup #6: Caring about cannot. Cannot's sensors are basically a punching bag lol.
Don't gearfag if you're too dumb to gearfag properly.
