>>4150265yeah really we could have probably stopped a while ago. no one is blowing pictures up this big and staring at details this small. there's no way it's relevant to normal people, not just birders who crop out 70% of the image. why do i need to see hair shaft texture in a face portrait? to make a 12x12 square print of an eyeball? seems pretty niche, you could just rent a camera for that and never do it again
>x-t5 shot using one of those "perfect" optical formulas>an even smaller crop than that chick's eye