>>4294800>Eventually someone will start doing AI transfers to cyanotype.That's a change of medium, not relevant to it being art or not. What I'm getting at is that AI will have to allow more control for true art to come out of it, it will have to let the artist direct even the minutest details. "Oh I don't like that brush stroke there, do it again". Eventually this becomes so common that people lose the ability to do it without AI, the crutch makes you handicapped by atrophy. The masters die and techniques die with them. AI learns what the artist wants and eventually can do what the artist wants without corrective input, the artist gets lazy and fully relies on AI. He atrophies his own artistic vision, what he now perceives as his vision is the AI's version of it. AI tells people what to think, how to perceive and more without them even realizing they're minds have been molded in the AI's image at that point. The AI that started by using what was known about the human mind as a model ends up becoming the model for the human mind, malleable as it ever was. Even worse in women's case sadly as most spectacularly demonstrated by (((Edward Bernays))) back in the day. Today it's already even worse than it was back in his day. I've seen the influence of twatter and pozzflix in their beliefs first-hand. You can almost see their minds being manipulated in real time, it's gross. Not all women are like that, and some men are like that too. But far too many women are like that, even ones that on the surface appear less sheepish. AI in its infinite growth potential will eventually be able to manipulate all but the most stubbornly independent thinkers out there. A primitivist takeover will eventually appear as the only viable alternative to being cattle for the AI overlords.
>>4294801>first time you said something that makes senseNot even my first time saying it on this board lol