>>4137461>Unless you have some medium format art repro digital files, you're missing out.Don't try to imply somehow books compensate for not having the actual original print in a way digital files can't. That's just silly.
>>4137438I have one of his books. Its not that good of printing so it kind a sucks. I am sure I could find a better book. Digital is the same though, some files are better than others so its kind of a wash comparing books to digital. I would rather have digital files to look at because this
>>4137470My monitor is calibrated so I am good for viewing on it. I want to be able to directly compare his works to mine an manipulate both to on a computer for study and understanding.