Quoted By:
Nice comments, they are more than legitimate.
When discussing old photos without preserved negatives, you can't print new copies unless from a scan of the preserved sample; paper can easily deteriorate, whereas NFTs (or rather, the blockchain) today have more chances to survive over time. Am I wrong? It's true that history has always been fake, but when you have an original photo, at most you can interpret it, not falsify it.
"You are late with that scam," please explain. Nobody is obligated to purchase; The AJ Project is primarily born as an archive, as a hobby of collecting. Then if someone wants to buy the NFT, they would also have the original antique photo with the export license. Honestly, I don't see a scam... And I also believe it's the first project of its kind. In the Italian Ministry of Culture, when I presented the project to the officials in order to obtain the export licenses, they were surprised and intrigued. Perhaps all of this will lead to nothing, but at least I tried... I wouldn't mind being the first antique dealer in the metaverse (sure, as an experiment, this is pioneering, even a bit rough, okay, but I'm here to listen to criticism and advice)
