>>4235040not him but
* not overexposing (not sure if it's the scan or the actual photo)
* choosing what's in the photo with more delibration instead of just ignoring what's in the frame. you could've waited and not had that vehicle in the foreground, you could've found a spot where the poles weren't in the foreground, etc.
* focus on aesthetic value more: try to arrange the buildings in some orderly way instead of this photo which is pointed left and rotated from level
* find some people to focus on in the foreground
>>4235006 >>4235008 >>4235010based streetshooter
>>4234963this image suffers a lot from being so small. you would need to expand it to see any detail but I can't.
>>4234848>>4234957nice