>>4232180>/p/ gearfags be like>I see, so you are saying that rather than being best represented by 16mm motion picture film with normal set lighting, memory is best represented by 6k 120fps 4:2:2 12 bit footage with the autofocus tracking of a sony A7R V, an f0.8 lens, and strong subject isolation lighting so that the background is at least 4 stops underexposed?>Indeed, perhaps more purchasing power is in order if memory is to be sufficiently represented using photographic media. But full frame will not suffice. He seems to be implying that the detail level is arbitrary. We will have to await the full video specifications of the fujifilm GFX100 II before making a decision. The human has stated that memory is not digital, so increasing the sampling rate to 100 million pixels may create an effect humans perceive as realistic.>>4232186people enjoying a medium and people saying dumb spec sheet waving shit about a medium having stupidly high megapixel numbers or "looking like a memory" are two very different things