>>4112339X-T2. Felt like a big step up from the X-T1, and was finally good enough for me to switch away from Sony (a7II, a7rII). X-T3 felt like X-T2 + better AF / video and launched at a very reasonable $1500. X-T4 felt only worth it for video, and not as compelling at the time for me. X-T5 feels like another big step up.
>>4112432I love the the X-T4/H2/s flip out screen mostly because I can leave it flipped back 95% of the time and ignore the LCD completely, and the rare 5% of time when I need it to shoot awkward angles, it's more convenient than the X-T3/5 screen. If I actually used it a lot though, and especially for waist level shooting, X-T3/5 screen all the way. Both have pros and cons.
>>4112442>EVFs just aren't there yetTo each their own, but they've been "there" for me for years now.
> It really would be nice if they had an option to turn off exposure previewEveryone I've tried does have that option. I leave it off on all of my Fuji cameras. Great for people to learn on, but all I need is a histogram.
>>4112444X100T/F/V and X-Pro2/3 all offer MF aides through the ERF window while using the OVF, picrel. It's more functional and precise than my M10, but slower to use in practice as the window is in the corner rather than centered like the RF patch. That said, I love just using the OVF with autofocus, and it's the reason I bring my X-Pro3 over my M10 quite often.
>>4112462Agree.
