>>4113120>m43 doesn't deserve one bit of hate. like it or not it's good at what it wants to be. panasonic and olympus/OM system also have great service and the system is still alive.I can agree with that, having a general for them is gay though.
>cope about EVFs and hating sony (because sony+third party glass is the affordable mirrorless solution they turned their noses up at)EVFs are gay, and so is Sony. I commend pentaxfags for turning their noses up at Sony, it's almost the worst brand out there with products that are miserable to use with garbage build quality.
>and fuji (because it's better than pentax)kek, better at what? It's the only brand that people are better off buying Sony instead. Better at poor build quality? Better at having wormy images?
>fuji has great lenseslol no
>the cameras put out nice SOOC jpegslol no, they only look nice if you're into the whole instagram filter aesthetic
>what do they have?amazing build quality and weather sealing, the biggest and brightest viewfinder you can get in a crop camera, great low light capabilities (to name an example, the K-3 III outperforms the X-T4 in dynamic range by over one stop across all ISO values and it goes much higher too), they're the only brand that can compete with Nikon on ergonomics, amazing features like astrotracer or pixel shift. You also get some technical camera-like perspective control. All IBIS-powered.
>it's also the heaviest full frame system in existenceNot even close. 1D X III is 1440g vs the 1010g of the K-1 II.
D850 is 1015g. D6 is 1270g. The 5D IV is 120g lighter than the K-1 II but it's inferior in almost every way outside video features. D780 is lighter too but it's 2/3 the resolution.
>fuji ILC ergos do kind of suck i will admitNo shit.
>but what good are pentax DLSR ergos when your camera weighs 10 pounds and is nearly a decade behind?For starters you get an EVF and no worms. The weight is actually a good thing, stabilizes the system and builds muscle you DYEL twink.
