>>4261059Reading those half assed charts is a common mistake maintained by FOOL turds because they'd rather believe the incorrect answer than the correct one.
>Normalize exposure for measured ISO (if a one stop push causes your sensor to fall apart it was worthless anyways)>OH SHIT>WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED>THE NEWED FOOL TUDS IS WORSE THAN AN OLD ASS APS-C DSLR>>4261061>THERE IS NO LYINGCOPE
O
P
E
FUCKING COPE, FAGGOT. COPE. COOOOOPE
AHAHA YOU FUCKING CANCEROUS FLAT EARTH RETARD
YOU FUCKING LOSE
ONE SHITTY TEST SHOT IS ENOUGH TO PROVE YOU WRONG, PERIOD
YOU
FUCKING
LOSE
COPE.
https://www.dxomark.com/glossary/iso-speed/#:~:text=DxOMark%20measures%20ISO%20sensitivity%20at,to%20q%20%3D%2071%2F100.&text=with%20Lsat%20being%20the%20minimum%20luminance%20necessary%20to%20reach%20sensor%20saturation.
https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/Measured_ISO.htmC O P E.
NOW SAY "POST A PHOTO" AND BREAK DOWN WHILE SPAMMING PURE PHOTOGRAPHIC INCOMPETENCE SO WE CAN LAUGH
F O O L T U R D
>BUT BUT IF IF IF BUT IFSEE THE PICTURE
LOOK AT IT
FUCKING COPE, MANCHILD FAGGOT TRANNY.
>S-STOP DOWN NOOO CANON IBIS CANT WORK YOU HAVE TOAHAHAHHAA NO
DYING SYSTEM THAT CANT EVEN BEAT FUJI'S MARKET SHARE WITH THE S%/S1 ROLLED IN WITH THE STATS AHAHAH FUCKING COPE YOU FAGGOT TRANNY, COPE. FOOL TURD. COPE.
