>>4262083>They are really heavyNot anymore unless you're pathetically weak, "carrying 6lbs must cause scoliosis" tier.
>And slow to useNot anymore unless you are the most talentless of the talentless and have the timing and reaction times of a rock.
The only reason anyone here isn't using a GFX100II is because they are poor (or stupid - or both). It's ok to just admit that you're poor. Just admit that, instead of trying to argue that fool frame poorfaggotry is superior, rather than just a budget constrained answer to the cost of getting decent readout speeds on larger sensors. We know you didn't rationally want FF because it was better, it was just the best you could afford.
>inb4 muh equivalency! if you dont have an f0.5 lens its not better! copeSorry but photography above base ISO is amateurish non-art. Reconsider your need for a real camera if you are a high ISO cat snapper or wedding snapshitter. If you're just walking around using the light that god gave you maybe an x100v is more your speed?
>NO YOU CANT SHOOT BASE ISO WITH SMALL APERTURESA real artist controls 100% of the scene. That includes the light intensity. Art = creative work. More creative work, more art. Goodbye now.
>inb4 muh fool frame has this big telephoto zoom that i "need"Sounds like a skill issue. Couldn't get closer? Yes, it takes work to take better photos than your 35mm toy. Welcome to the real world kid. If you want an easy camera so bad go buy a sony rx10 or nikon coolpix p1000.
