>>4238857Yes, it was expired in 2015 but the batch was pretty well preserved
Only like 3-4 pictures had some sort of minimal haze to them, and I shot it at 400 like normal
But for these photos I'm not sure if it's truly haze or if it's because they were behind a glass and it was at night, maybe it's a bit of light reflecting from it
Picrel is from the same roll
>>4238746This one too
Btw would appreciate criticisms for them, if anyone could share their thoughts:
>>4237811>>4237812>>4237814>>4237815>>4238026>>4238746Thanks