>>4228001>Making a full frame camera without IBIS is inexcusable. Not when most of your lenses have OIS.
>jpeg>A7 III not A7 IIWhy were you afraid to show RAWs or the camera in question? The A7 III costs more than the A7 II or RP. How did it become the comparison point? Should I post a comparison with the R5 or the R3?
>if you can't use stabilization without a small selection of canon branded snowflake lenses? If you have to lie to make your case, then your case is not valid. There are a ton of stabilized EF and RF lenses.
>Meanwhile you care most about pixel peeping noise at ISO levels nobody uses, The A7 II is already unusable by 12,800 and is iffy at 6400. Despite having good base ISO DR, it has probably the worst FF high ISO of cameras from the 2010's. You would have to go back to something like a 5D mark II to do worse.
Now all of this is relative. At the right price there is nothing wrong with a 5D II or an A7 II. But there are other options, even at the A7 II's price point.
>and will probably complained that I set this to "jpeg" You didn't just deceptively set it to jpeg, you deceptively chose the A7 III. In camera JPEG NR is irrelevant unless you're a Ken Rockwell student who only shoots JPEG. Desktop computer NR is far better. Doesn't change the relative performance though.
>And complain just as hard about how I set this to "print"You should start by choosing the right camera.
