>>4228097>Changes the subject to shilling a $1300 20mp camera that is overly video focusedFucking kek.
>8 stop IBISLiterally no full frame camera has 8 stop IBIS. It's 5 stop IBIS + 3 stop lens VR. You are lying, straight up. 8 stop IBIS means you could expect that with say, a leica lens, which is superior to anything canon has ever made in terms of rendering, but you would not get it. You would get 5 stops. Canon themselves strongly implies this by listing how much stabilization you get with each lens and only specifying RF mount lenses with OIS. That would apply, if you wanted to only use those RF mount lenses.
No replying to any of your NO IT DOESNT MATTER bullshit. That's a cope, you fucking DIPSHIT brand fanboy.
>You can adapt any vintage lens you want.Without any IBIS at all on the RP lmfao.
>Not taking the bait of you processing files differently to try and salvage your argument.the only hard, explicitly defined data on this matter is that the RP and A7II have a ~1/2 stop difference in PDR at ISO 12800.
the only hard, explicitly defined data on this matter is that the RP and A7II have a ~1/2 stop difference in PDR at ISO 12800.
the only hard, explicitly defined data on this matter is that the RP and A7II have a ~1/2 stop difference in PDR at ISO 12800.
All of your posts are cope and lies until you can answer ONE simple question
>>4228077Is the image on the right the A7II or the RP?
>>4228101the only hard, explicitly defined data on this matter is that the RP and A7II have a ~1/2 stop difference in PDR at ISO 12800.
the only hard, explicitly defined data on this matter is that the RP and A7II have a ~1/2 stop difference in PDR at ISO 12800.
the only hard, explicitly defined data on this matter is that the RP and A7II have a ~1/2 stop difference in PDR at ISO 12800.
All of your posts are cope and lies until you can answer ONE simple question
>>4228077Is the image on the right the A7II or the RP?
