>>4308017I don't find it upsetting, I think it's incredibly based that you could have put together a kit 40 years ago and have it still be all you'd ever need.
Seriously, short of someone coming out with a brand new film camera that uses a laser rangefinder to focus mirrorless lenses, or calculates reciprocity, or has a built in set of nds and polarisers or focus magnifiers, compensated focus shift, etc
>ie some shit we've never seen before that would completely change how you shot landscape or the glass you useI can't see myself ever changing the cameras I prefer to use.
