The story thus far
>Even if you double your megapixels, "reach" is only a slight improvement in a borderline unrecognizable blobhttps://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htmSmall differences in pixel count, between say 5 MP and 8MP, are unimportant because pixel counts are a square function. It's exactly like calculating area or square footage. It only takes a 40% increase in linear dimensions to double the pixel count! Doubling pixel count only increases the real, linear resolution by 40%, which is pretty much invisible.
>Crop sensors take slightly blurrier pictures, and giant expensive cope lenses that are larger and sharper than their full frame versions don't change thatWho could have predicted this?
https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/full-frame-advantage.htm>Nobody ITT posted any actual photography - literally BLURRY DOTSOf all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these: Ken Rockwell was right again.
https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm>Equipment Measurbator: Bottom Level 1 ("Hell")These men (and they are all men) have no interest in art or photography because they have no souls. Lacking souls they cannot express imagination or feeling, which is why their images, if they ever bother to make any, suck.
The one type of gear these people ignore is the only type of gear that actually helps: lighting.
Someone with a decent portfolio is not an equipment measurbator. Someone with more cameras than decent photos just may be. (cANON is up to 3 cameras and 0 photos)
>Online Expert: Level 0 (these guys don't take pictures so they aren't a level of photographer.)
Holy Cow! This was a guy who doesn't even own a camera!
