>>4306789Yeah, but most cameras don't have a raw histogram, only jpeg and sometimes not even RGB. So whitebalance makes the shitstogram even more deceptive. Also the camera's meter may or may not take white balance into account, so it may expose raws correctly in some light but not others. There's an old trick I used to use where you could set the white balance to some ugly green color to make the jpeg histogram more accurately represent the raw values, but it made it too hard to chimp so I stopped using it.
>>4306788>its not you retardDoes it change when you change the settings? Then it's not a raw histogram. The raw doesn't change just because you fiddle a slider. I'll admit I don't use lightroom but your own screenshots show it changing.
>>4306821dead