>>4276894>"lug a large mirrorless"pic related, the one calling mirrorless large
>quality doesn't matterquality matters for the elite few. people who own their own homes and can hang up huge prints wherever they fucking want and have college degrees and appropriate salaries for them. people who look at everything on apple studio displays, not last year's iphone.
look at what camera sales were like BEFORE digital point and shoots were sold for $100 at walmart. that's where they're going back to. and look at who used them - the wealthy.
you are small, weak, and poor, but that doesn't mean products meant for better built more successful people are suddenly irrelevant. they are very relevant. it's actually more that you, yourself, are less relevant than us. when you're not being replaced by automation your wages are stagnating and your rent is going up to keep you working. the rest of us just bought new cameras, again. every day more homeless hit the streets, more retards and drug addicts end up on welfare, more guns are banned to keep you from complaining, and another few hundred of the elite few preorder their canon r1. we are the actual economy, you are a stand in for a better production line.
now ask why so many famous 20th century photographers came from wealthy families or had wealthy friends
it's because photography was always for rich people, retard. poor people don't need more than a simple record of their existence. simple things for simple folk.
look at leica camera AG, that's what's next for the entire camera industry.
