>>4302054>>4302066Sorry, I was carrying forward my awareness of the old 200 datasheets and actual film tests on the new product, it looks as though they've responded to that by re-writing the curves for cn-16 chems instead of c-41 and starting at 1.0 over d-min rather than 0.2.
I'll commit harajuku immediately for my mistake.
I still contend it's the same film though.
>>4302064>by which metrics, exactly?Not going bankrupt was a pretty big one, but also by making slide filme with a minilab process that would last longer than 5 minutes both on the shelf and after processing?
By making my particular favourite film, Reala?
And by making superia 200 and 400, which are just nicer, more colour accurate films than their kodak counterparts.
>>4302078>the only film they make is for 16 years old girlYep, and they make fat stacks doing it.
Current Kodak is a spinoff of a spinoff of a picked carcass. I'm glad they exist and seem to be releasing new films, I just really hope Fuji actually decides to start producing roll film again because it's actually better to use.
