>>4301404You still don't understand that it's not about "I don't like how it looks" and it's more about "we're marching towards a monopoly in a niche market with only Kodak as a major player producing colour film leading to film price increasing even more and us being in the hands of only one company", do you?
Even if it was "hurr the poor lomography durr" (which doesn't even make sense, how is picrel "lomo" at all?), there are people who like those films and shoot them and if there weren't those films it would mean less people shooting film
Which is less labs, less film companies, less sales in chemicals etc. etc.
We're not talking about the car market or something, we're talking about film
And I want as much people as possible shooting film, even if it's stocks I don't like
If you can't understand this, then you'll keep on thinking it's about "film stocks I like"
Btw why do you care so much about film stocks if you're a nophoto?
