>>4218531Thanks anon. I like this one... composition and edit are solid.
>>4218539>120, 4x5 and 5x8 film all have better shadows and higlights detail than any smaller film or any full frame/apsc digital camera sensor in existance.The only thing that changes when shooting larger formats is grain reduction, resolution increase, optics(compression and dof), and tonality.
shadow/highlight detail or DR is completely controlled by chemistry. If you shoot 35mm, 120, and 4x5 of the same scene, with the same film, exposure settings, and develop with the same developer for the same time, they will have extremely similar DR.
>>4218539>>4218540> forgot to mention that even when converting film to digital, the film still retains more sharpness, it still retains more detail in shadows, more detail in highlights, captures a bigger color space, softer color tones and so on and so forth.Demonstrably false. Film's color gamut is smaller than digital due to Subtractive color being worse gamut wise than additive color. The grain(noise) ruins any resolution advantage film may have. There are not soft color/tonal transitions with film, they are fundamentally noisy.
In terms of shadow/highlight detail, film is inferior. While film is more resistant to overexposure than digital, digital has far more shadow latitude and detail.
Color film is especially soft, color film's MTF chart fall off faster than your erections, where digital can at least maintain 60% contrast to the Nyquist sampling limit.
