>>3263265I guess I just consider it fraudulent. I don't even like fucking with exposure beyond making it as true to life as possible, even if the lighting was shit.
Part of wildlife is missing a lot of shots due to a variety of reasons. If I can deal with that, then I can deal with a few issues in some of the ones I do get.
This, for instance:
>>3262006If it were mine, I'd wish things weren't pushed so close to the edges of the frame... I could definitely alter it to look better. But I wouldn't.
There's always another day, and another subject. All part of the fun.
