>>4285826>>4285825I can actually corroborate this. The A7RIII was prettier at high ISOs than the Z7II. Part of his is stuffing 3669x5504 into 1.41 mb, but still. Nikon puts out amazing files, but high ISOs are a bit mushy.
What do the A7RIII and canon cameras have in common? Do you know? Maybe it's just another case of raw just being minimally processed and some manufacturers more applying more or different pre-nr/sharpening than others.