>>4101487>Post only photos that show at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition. Do not upload random snapshots.Your idea has failed the second one.
If you're going to talk about people who should get banned or whatever then you're in for a surprise.
>>4101471>You do not need to know the name or the process of the artist unless you are childish and want to get into an effort contest to try and elevate less visually pleasing work because you put more work into it. That is a layman's approach to art.That's all fine and dandy until you realize absolute snapshits only get praised because of the name attached to them. Also that has nothing to do with effort. Winogrand put a lot of effort in his random snapshits, he took thousands of photographs. Doesn't make them art. It's the creative process that matters. And an art photograph shouldn't win a Pulitzer. Ironically one of my favorite photos ever is definitely not art. It's a snapshot and I aspire to one day capture a picture as great as that one, but I won't be calling it art even if I manage to. Because I'll be a passive spectator, a thief of moments, not an architect of them when I do. And that isn't art. The concept of "found art" is revolting and only supported by circlejerkers who profit from it and marks of the con.
Stuckists were right about Duchamp, his work was a protest against the conformist criticism but it was taken unironically and now the conformists praise readymades.
