>>4165318are u in the area??
>>4165468isn't a raw easier to adjust than a jpg which has already had a color profile processed in? if so, i would consider that more "neutral" since there's no committal to a particular look
>>4165578i don't see what the bundle does for you if you don't want the 17mm/1.4 or the 50mm/1.2. consider the extra cost per lens of getting only the ufo and the 35 the savings of not having to deal with clutter or the trouble of offloading two extra lenses
