>>4274015>because this magical flawless affordable camera doesn't exist.Sure bud/
>>4273975>>4273964You want IBIS, so forget the X-T3, the X-T4's IBIS lets you shoot under the 1/focal length shutter speed rule with ease, important in low light.
A7C - $1000, X-T4 - $1000
>Night, dim street, and starsThis is a shitty thing to want on any system because the best lens ever for all of these things will necessarily be much larger to be wide angle AND fast. If f2 (f3 equivalent) aps-c is too slow for you, you want something close to f1.8 on FF, which is big on APS-C as well. Sigma 24mm f2: $400-650. Fuji 16mm f1.4: $450-650. Don't think of going faster if you value your wallet. You can save a lot of space if your lens is a stop slower.
>bad weatherSony a7c and fuji xt4 weather sealing is as good as anyone's. Shills here will disagree because they're stalking /p/ waiting to tell us the exact moment canon puts a refurb body on sale for a day. Surely you've noticed that. We actually do have paid shills. No one monitors canon's refurb body sales for free.
>WildlifeThis is a big lens on full frame or APS-C. Don't expect to fill the frame with a sparrow thats way, way over there if you want a compact lens, don't expect good low light if you want a compact lens. It's also big on micro four thirds if you're not shooting with bridge camera tier aperture ranges like f8-11. Fuji has the size advantage because it captures a little less light.
Pxlmag's lens scaling is inaccurate for sony E. The sigma 24 f2 is 72mm long, the fuji 16 is 73mm long. But the sony 300mm is just way bigger than the fuji amateur wildlife zoom either way. Sony FE 70-300: $650-$1k. Fuji 55-200: $350-700.
Verdict: Buy an X-T4 if you favor wildlife, and an a7c if you favor street.
>inb4 300mm isnt for wildlife!not for overdone frame filling bokeh portraits of tiny birds.
>>4274066its different levels of underexposing and applying a curve to get a bright image with preserved highlights
