>>4301601you want the lines to be as close to the top as possible. the lower they are, the blurrier the image is. the lp/mm numbers are the resolution. compare those charts with
>>4301309 or pic related for nikons 800mm. there is a significant difference of 10/30lp/mm and 20/60lp/mm in the graphs, but this is because the MFT sensor is a fraction of the size of a full frame, and due to how tiny the photo sites are, they require higher resolution lenses to give an equivalently sharp image. the take away is that 150-400 isnt really that sharp, and looks even worse once you use its built in teleconverter, as they dont provide mtf charts of that. and whatever anon is shilling it might as well just buy a bridge camera like a p1000 as the ability to zoom in no matter how blurry the image is all he cares about.
>>4301634if you're having to post ken rockwell quotes you must really be butthurt as there arent any facts on your side. which is also ironic because ken rockwell posts mtf charts in all of his "reviews"