>>3731272Phones WISH they could take photos this good.
>>3731257>>3731276You're using that V550/V600 in the background there, right?
Colors are wonky. Here's an edit and some high pass sharpening that would do better on a TIFF obviously but whatever.
>>3734667You what?
>>3735755Different sized sensors and glass elements DO alter the image by seeing things in different ways but it is slight, or requires drastic differences in design to achieve different things. What most retards are talking about is nonsense that has been debunked time and time again.
Retards don't understand perspective and just go brainlet mode on "I shoot portrait with 80mm at this distance, then I move closer with a 50mm, whoA THE BACKGROUND!! C O M P R E S S I O N!!!!" without realizing their perspective changed.
Example
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TTXY1Se0egEveryone knows a NASA size lens sees things differently than a MFT lens. Sensor size and lens diameter plays a role, focal length not so much.
