Quoted By:
z6ii 2 hour review from a former snoy perspective:
ergonomics are not actually better but every camera feels too small for my hands anyways, even DSLRs feel cramped, EC button position is retarded
less customization
auto iso controls are much worse, sony had auto ISO's shutter speed controls in its own fn menu or custom button. that was nice.
PSAM > PASM
detail is worse than 42mp of course, but it doesn't matter that much unless you like recreating that oppenheimer frame gif or need the print sizes
colors are much better in jpeg and any raw processor, which is what actually matters (normies dgaf about you're megapickels)
nikon is not retarded enough to write corrections to raws, not like they have to anyways with 0.5-1ev less vignetting on every lens
S line lenses are totally worth it and i wonder if i should have bought the 35mm f1.8 to go with the 85mm instead of the 24-70 f4
noise characteristics are MUCH better even at the maximum native ISO, where it still looks better than my phone
SOOC jpeg noise reduction is a bit too aggressive and waxy at all levels
eye AF in stills is a little worse from some angles and better head on
AF kind of sucks in video at least with this lens unless you use lock on subject tracking (which is right there on nikon vs. a menu option on sony)
totally missing and somewhat important:
AF-D support (sony already did it years ago. when ftz3?)
weather sealed megadap ETZ adapter
worth it?
i don't think i'd do it if i had the newest and bestest A7R V or a9iii or planned on getting one and wanted the lenses built up, but it's better than a lesser snoy, and I like the controls/colors more than canon (having used an 80d) and a lot more than pentax
