>>3806052>Four Thirdsseems unlikely
>eye-strainingdo they even optical viewfinder
>smallerisnt that just a meme?
>depth of fieldeffective aperture changes the same way 35mm equivalency does.
I never look at 4/3rds so I don't know, but I seriously doubt it would be useful. The mass and balance of a bigger camera is a good thing for telephoto.
This goy isnt paying all those sheckels for an entirely new system.
also: peoples backs