>>4305565>SamefagWrong, but any "proof" would prove nothing.
>unless it benefited your far right conspiracy claims of courseNo, there wasn't any photographic truth and it's a hill I'm willing to die on. A photograph is a record and records can be faked.
>you always say that.Because it's the truth.
>right on, special agent vodkowski. i believe it.Not give up, but realize trying to turn photography into an unquestionable vessel of truth by itself is retarded and pointless.