>>4132353Yeah sure it's the same light! And large sensors don't consistently have superior signal/noise ratio to the point that ancient cheapo FF DSLRs are still outdoing expensive as fuck fugayflops in realistic use cases. I'll spare you the raw (its worse) because jpegs have NR applied and closely represent what you might actually print with, as an unskilled user.
If you want to use your camera for what a "real camera" is meant for, which is printing photos, there's really nothing that beats the quality and versatility of full frame, and with the way the used market is you don't give up much for it. Even for the web, full frame definitely has an edge if you are going to be cropping photos (wildlife webzines?) or using them as wallpapers or other screen-spanning applications ESPECIALLY with how large and hi-dpi modern screens are.
