[139 / 15 / 51]
123KiB, 1415x1112, Digital-Camera-Sensor-Size-Comparison-Chart.jpg
Quoted By: >>4131018 >>4131020 >>4131023 >>4131029 >>4131037 >>4131342 >>4131350 >>4131895 >>4131924 >>4132246 >>4132928 >>4133620 >>4137615 >>4138882
The never ending debate. How important is sensor size really? There is obviously a use for each format and they each have their pros and cons. How important is it to you? Speaking in terms of easily portable cameras, which in my mind, full frame mirrorless cameras are easily portable.
I only one an older apsc body, but I have really nice, current lenses. I find my auto focus in low light and low light performance in general to be frustrating often. Even when shooting at f1.4.
My next logical move is to go to full frame. Either an older model that will still have the frustrating autofocus in low light or a significantly more expensive newer full frame that comes with a bunch of newer features, half of which I even care about.
Is the value even there if I have to buy new FF lenses?
I only one an older apsc body, but I have really nice, current lenses. I find my auto focus in low light and low light performance in general to be frustrating often. Even when shooting at f1.4.
My next logical move is to go to full frame. Either an older model that will still have the frustrating autofocus in low light or a significantly more expensive newer full frame that comes with a bunch of newer features, half of which I even care about.
Is the value even there if I have to buy new FF lenses?
