>>4233655I turned off capture sharpening to favor the film scan. Here is the same area with some little sharpening, I do more aggressive sharpening after sizing and upscaling for print.
For reference, this would area would be roughly 5.25"x3" at 300ppi, which would a total size of 55x34". Any artifacts seen in this screenshot would impossible to see in the print, which is fuck off big.
>>4233727Exactly. Film is grainy! There is nothing wrong with that, sometimes I add grain to my digital b/w shots. To claim that MF or LF is higher iq that modern FF digital or MF digital is just dumb.