>>4298716>I dont have to shift anythingYou actually do. If ISO is mislabeled you cant compare DR between cameras using a chart against LABELED ISO. YOU ARE MAKING A FALSE COMPARISON
>actually I'm taller than you because i count starting from 2! - P2P Chartfag "logic"So if you compare the chart as is, you are being told your fuji has 10.4 stops of dynamic range at "ISO 126", but if you exposed an actual photo instead of looking at the chart, using settings from a standards following camera or a film camera instead of fuji's on-camera meter (which suggests the extra exposure for the REAL ISO, not the labeled one), IT WOULD BE ONE STOP TOO DARK. You have 10.4 stops of dynamic range at ISO 63. NOT ISO 126.
The Panasonic Lumix G9M2 is reported to have 10.18 stops of dynamic range at "ISO 100", labeled, the REAL ISO is closer to ISO 64.
THE FUJI X100VI, WITH A SENSOR 1.5 TIMES LARGER, HAS LESS THAN A HALF STOP OF EXTRA DYNAMIC RANGE OVER MICRO FOUR THIRDS (BEFORE PANASONIC'S DR BOOST FEATURE IS ENABLED WHICH ADDS ONE AND A FUCKING HALF EXTRA STOPS OF DYNAMIC RANGE IF YOUR SHUTTER SPEED IS 1/60 OR LOWER)
FOOL-JIFILM: 10.4 STOPS DR AT REAL ISO 63
10.18 + 1.5 = 11.68 STOPS OF DR AT REAL ISO 64 ON G9II
NIGGON ZF = 11.12 STOPS OF DR AT REAL ISO 80
Even if you CANT afford a G9II, the DR difference between FOOLjiFAILm x-tranny and micro for THADS is STILL less than half a stop AKA UNNOTICEABLE. What IS noticeable?
Fuji worms and general xtranny shittiness
Paying more for less reach and more weight
Paying more for worse video specs and worse FPS
Paying more for shitty larp dial ergos when the entire world uses normal DSLR style bodies for a reason (you are a dumb hipster)
FUJI = SCAM.
MICRO FOUR THIRDS IS SHARPER, DOES BETTER VIDEO, HAS MORE REACH, HAS MORE PORTABILITY, AND HAS MORE DYNAMIC RANGE THAN FOOLJI-FAIL XTRANNY. CONFIRMED. MICRO FOUR THIRDS VICTORY.
