>>4305294For me it was picrel, hp m417, which was mediocre even for its time. But my parents went with cheap but still functional, rather than go cheap into junk off brand tier. They got it for me getting a 4.0 junior year or something like that back in 2004ish. Being a digital hoarder since I think I still have pics from it somewhere, but not many. Honestly though it’s one of those things where if we look at the specs and performance today we’d call it a piece of trash, but using it back then was fine, fun even because I was one of the first kids I knew with a digital camera. Funny how that works.