>>4237983Do you know why you shouldn't use these charts?
According to noise perf charts the G9 has less noise than the Z50 at every ISO. No "actually thats not equivalent you need to compare ISO 1600 to 3200" shit here, the chart says that ISO 3200 on the G9 is cleaner by a fractional stop at ISO 3200.
https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20Z%2050,Panasonic%20Lumix%20DC-G9According to dpreviews studio test scene, which is exposure normalized (if camera 1 takes darker photos at ISO 3200 f5.6 1/1250, they raise exposure in post so if ISO 1600 were labeled as 3200, it is now 3200 anyways), well, yeah...
Nope.
The G9 II just threw in some more NR, which is what sony did with basically every camera and what cucknon and niggon mirrorless have been doing to pretend their cameras are actually getting better rather than stagnating since the DSLR era. People who dont use rawdigger and other dumb gearfag shit already knew this, their finished pictures dont come out any better with mirrorless.
>Where's the M43 takeover if its JUST AS GUDDDDD?Fucking nowhere because it isn't. M43 is an ILC PNS intended to be a hobby camera for instagram posters. I recommend it for that but not for spending big bucks on anything.
>>4238001Your photos suck tom. That's why you don't post them anymore and spend more time arguing against common sense and reality than handling your dusty, crusty cameras.
