>>4249564>Great, with 1.5 stop of FF (not real) IBIS Canon's IBIS is confirmed by a 3rd party. Panasonic's G9 IBIS is claimed yet unconfirmed, just like their ISO.
>you are now tied 3.5 stops ahead is not "tied."
>At this point you win, there is no glass that I can buy, even at equivalent aperture that can compensate a 2017 generation sensor (probably something from the 2015-ish catalogue) against a $4k body.You can't even compensate against a 2012 sensor in a used <$1k body.
>>4249565>it's 12800 FF vs 3200 m43, start from there.No it's not. Though I also fucked up because I was thinking about IBIS, got distracted, and added it twice. So WITHOUT IBIS:
FF: f/1.4 35mm ISO 12800
vs
m43 f/0.95 17.5mm ISO 6400 (your fastest lens is only 1 stop faster, a f/0.7 version does not exist)
WITH IBIS:
FF: f/1.4 35mm ISO 12800
vs
m43 f/0.95 17.5mm ISO 25600
